Comparison Between BEV (battery electric vehicle) and FCV (Fuel cell vehicle)
The alternative vehicles like gasoline-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), PHEV, BEV, FCEV’s making impact on low or no-emissions vehicles in the market for future. The combination of bio-fuels, electric and fuel cell vehicles will reduce the emissions and as well consumption of oil. Moreover it will be ultimate solution for all three problems i.e. 3E’s (Energy-Environ-Economic). Still ICE modifications needed or to be replace by electric or battery cars in order to reduce substantially GHG emissions. FC or battery should store the energy and able to deliver max amount of energy at the desired power density by smallest possible weight and volume. Terms used in FC or battery are storage capacity, energy density, power density (watts/kg), voltage efficiencies, life time, etc. The comparison made the manufacturing and refueling costs of a BEV and a FCV capable of delivering HP and driving certain distance.
Both fuel cell and batteries need energy to generate electricity, FC – energy from Hydrogen stored or on-board production will supply electricity in the vehicle, whereas batteries will get energy stored from electricity grid by charging.

Percentage of new cars sold over the 21st century for the hydrogen-powered fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) scenario, showing the mixture of gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICV), followed by gasoline-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), (cellulosic) ethanol-powered plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) and finally the hydrogen-powered FCEV.
Two main factors are important while comparsion made between FC and BEV, for FC the hydrogen production and effeciency of the process is the main factor in deciding the cost and out put power density. Considering renewable H2 producion then we should specify what type and efficency value, for eg. wind energy integrated with electrolyser might not efficient incomparsion with Battery as mentioned in the literature, if you consider other alternatives like natural gas reforming to produce H2 with 75-80 % reforming efficiency then the final output effeciency would be much greater than Battery. At the moment the BEV performs much better in terms cost, durability, manufacturing, charging, etc. FC face many challenges in order to compete with BEV and in order to eneter commercialization in next 10-20 years, one major advantage in case FCV is refuelling time is very short comapred to rechargin time (many hours).
A compressed hydrogen powering a fuel cell can provide electricity to a vehicle traction motor with five times more energy per unit mass than current NiMH batteries used in most gasoline HEV, and two times more than advanced Lithium-ion batteries but H2 FC exhibits have low energy per volume (liter) comapred to abtteries or BEV. For shotr range distance less than 250-300 miles a BEV much better option comapred to FCV, but abover 400 km the FCV is advantageous for long range distances it gives much higher efficiencies than BEV.
Fuel cell electric vehicles are superior to advanced lithiumion
full function battery electric vehicles, since the fuel
cell EV: weighs less, takes up less space on the vehicle, generates less greenhouse gases in most of the US
costs less (lower vehicle costs and life-cycle costs), requires less well-to-wheels natural gas or biomass
energy, takes much less time to refuel.
Battery electric vehicles have three advantages compared to
fuel cell EVs: lower fuel cost per kilometer, less well-to-wheels wind or solar energy per kilometer, greater access to fueling capability initially.
Source of Information:
Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared by C.E. Thomas*
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 2009, 6005-6020.
H2Gen Innovations, Inc., 4740 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia, 22304, USA.
A cost comparison of fuel-cell and batterynext term electric vehicles by Stephen Eaves and James Eaves*
Journal of Power Sources, Volume 130, Issues 1-2, 3 May 2004, Pages 208-212








